Legal Opinion

Guy v. Ætna Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe evidence adduced on the plaintiff’s examination in chief, and the testimony of his other witnesses, was sufficient to carry the case to the jury.on the issue of plaintiff’s alleged total and permanent disability within the meaning of the policy in suit. Mitchell v. Assurance Society, 205 N. C., 721; Misskelley v. Ins. Co., 205 N. C., 496, 171 S. E., 862; Green v. Casualty Co., 203 N. C., 767, 167 S. E., 38; Bulluck v. Ins. Co., 200 N. C., 642, 158 S. E., 185. Compare Thigpen v. Ins. Co., 204 N. C., 551, 168 S. E., 837; Buckner v. Ins. Co., 172 N. C., 762.

The defendant, realizing the force…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Buckner v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Green v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Medlin v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Guy v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Hughes v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Ireland v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Bradley v. PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API