Gennett v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the case: The evidence was amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Guy v. Ins. Co., 206 N. C., 118, 172 S. E., 885; Baker v. Ins. Co., 206 N. C., 106, 172 S. E., 882; Misskelley v. Ins. Co., 205 N. C., 496, 171 S. E., 862; Mitchell v. Assurance Society, 205 N. C., 721, 172 S. E., 497; Bulluck v. Ins. Co., 200 N. C., 642, 158 S. E. 185. The witnesses differed sharply in their observations and conclusions. This made it a matter for the twelve.
It will be observed that plaintiff's disability arises out of an incurable disease, diabetes mellitus, which calls for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Buckner v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley v. PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Bradshaw v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Dellenbaugh v. Great American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935