Legal Opinion

Gennett v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 28, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: The evidence was amply sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Guy v. Ins. Co., 206 N. C., 118, 172 S. E., 885; Baker v. Ins. Co., 206 N. C., 106, 172 S. E., 882; Misskelley v. Ins. Co., 205 N. C., 496, 171 S. E., 862; Mitchell v. Assurance Society, 205 N. C., 721, 172 S. E., 497; Bulluck v. Ins. Co., 200 N. C., 642, 158 S. E. 185. The witnesses differed sharply in their observations and conclusions. This made it a matter for the twelve.

It will be observed that plaintiff's disability arises out of an incurable disease, diabetes mellitus, which calls for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Buckner v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Bulluck v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Bradshaw v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Dellenbaugh v. Great American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API