Fontana Builders, Inc. v. Assurance Company of America
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 70. (concurring). I agree with the majority that interpretation of the insurance polices at issue presents a question of law. Majority op., ¶ 5. I also agree that Fontana Builders, Inc. (Fontana) had a reasonable expectation that the builder's risk policy would persist while construction continued.
¶ 71. Further, I share the majority's concern over potential purchasers being able to unilaterally termi*534nate a builder's risk policy and agree that Fontana's builder's risk policy covered a different interest in the property than the Accolas' homeowner's policy from Chubb Insurance Co. (Chubb).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stebane Nash Co. v. Campbellsport Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Tischendorf v. Lynn Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Dunlavy v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Ben-Hur Manufacturing Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of New JerseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Society Insurance v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003