Legal Opinion
Stebane Nash Co. v. Campbellsport Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1965PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The defendants raise several issues upon appeal. We will first consider their contention that there is no proof of damage as to any insurable interest possessed by the plaintiff corporation.
It is clear that the plaintiff corporation did not and does not own the real estate, including the garage building destroyed in the fire. It is also without dispute that the real estate was owned by the four Stebane brothers individually, and that they had leased it to the corporation for a rental of $80 per month.
We are committed to what has been characterized by other courts and text.writers as the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jonas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Riggs v. Commercial Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Beyer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- F. Dohmen Co. v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Ramsdell v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Royal College Shop, Inc., a Kansas Corporation, and Thomas H. Black, Cross-Appellees v. Northern Insurance Co. Of N.Y., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Inn Operations, Inc. v. River Hills Motor Inn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania v. B. Cianciolo, Inc., and the Cianciolo Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of Deist Forest Products, Inc., Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Gustavson v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.