Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual abuse of a child. Punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions was assessed at life imprisonment.
Appellant was charged with sexually abusing a seven-year-old child. At trial, appellant argued the affirmative defense of insanity. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 8.01. 1 Appellant’s sole defense witness was Dr. Collier Cole, a clinical psychologist who testified that, in his opinion, appellant was a pedophiliac and could not conform his conduct to the requirements of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Arambula v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Tew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Davidson v. WallingfordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Zani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- LACAZE v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- O'CONNELL v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Thien Quoc Nguyen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.