Munzer v. Stern
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
A firm by the name of Livingston & Block was engaged in the dry goods amd retail cloak business in the city of Kalamazoo. In the summer of 1893 plaintiffs sold to this firm cloaks of the value of $2,728.50, shipping the same in July or August. About August 29 the plaintiffs learned that Livingston & Block had purchased a much larger amount of goods than formerly, and that they had been shipping goods away. Munzer thereupon went to Kalamazoo; intervewed Livingston & Block; at first tried to obtain payment, although the purchase price was not due until January following, by informing Livingston…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Montgomery v. PickeringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Pearse v. PettisNew York Supreme Court · 1866
- Smith v. SalomonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jack Mann Chevrolet Co. v. Associates Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Zadel v. SimonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Szarkowski v. PfisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Adams v. Edward M. Burke Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Adams v. Edward M. Burke Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.