Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1972No. 45277PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment, imposed by the court, sixty years imprisonment.

The appellant urges the insufficiency of the evidence identifying him as a participant in the commission of the offense and therefore challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict.

For the first time on appeal the appellant urges that his only identification as a participant in the offense was by a witness whose trial identification was tainted by a pretrial lineup. Since no objection to the identification of the appellant was made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Boothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. McGlothlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Dugger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Washington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API