Martinez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
The offense is robbery by assault; the punishment, assessed by the court after a jury verdict of guilty, 20 years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
This appeal presents the question of the admissibility of an in-court identification following a police lineup identification where the accused was without the benefit of counsel.
The State’s evidence reflects that on January 20, 1968, Zelma Voorhes, 59 years of age, lived alone in the City of Harlin-gen. At approximately 7 p. m. that day she arrived home from work as a saleslady in a local variety store.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Crane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.