Legal Opinion

Caley v. Manicke

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1962No. 36535PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice House

After a jury trial in the circuit court of Kane County, the plaintiff, Charles Caley, received a verdict and judgment of $20,000 against Daniel Manicke, defendant, for personal injuries allegedly suffered in a rear-end collision between their automobiles. The Appellate Court for the Second District affirmed the judgment, (Caley v. Manicke, 29 Ill. App. 2d 323,) but has granted a certificate of importance permitting defendant to appeal to this court as provided in section 75(2) (a) of the Civil Practice Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap, no, par. 75(2) (a).

The important question presented for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Jones v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ratner v. ArringtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Affett v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. WoodardsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Norwilton Murray v. Fairbanks Morse, Beloit Power Systems, Inc., in No. 78-2224. Cross Appeal of Norwilton Murray, in No. 78-2225Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Marut v. CostelloIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Barreto v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API