Legal Opinion

State v. Woodards

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1966No. 39248PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 ’Neill, J.

Errors are assigned as follows:(1) Two purported confessions of defendant were obtained in violation of Ms right to the assistance of counsel and were improperly used against him at trial.(2) Various items were seized incident to an invalid arrest and were improperly admitted into evidence.(3) Defendant was forced to wear handcuffs and body belt during the trial and was heavily guarded, and the trial court failed to keep order during the course of the trial.(4) The foreman of the jury failed to reveal on voir dire that he was the insurance agent of the sheriff and of a deputy…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. FranklinOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API