Legal Opinion

Dannells v. United States National Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

John Dannells died testate in Portland, Multnomah county, Oregon, on November 2, 1926. By his last will and testament he appointed the defendant bank as executor thereof. He bequeathed to his wife, Laura J. Dannells, one of the plaintiffs herein, $20,000, to his son Charles It. Dannells, $100, and to plaintiff, Dorothy Dannells, wife of Charles R. Dannells, the sum of $1,000. He also bequeathed $1,000 each to Mary Neuman and Christina Skans. He devised and bequeathed the residue of his estate to defendant bank in trust, directing and authorizing said bank as such trustee to pay to plaintiff,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gay v. ParpartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Brown v. . KinseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Woods v. Montevallo Coal & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Smith v. DuBoseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Bowling v. Bowling's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Latham v. LathamOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fox v. HohensheltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Gostevskyh v. KaluginCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Naimo v. La FianzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API