Clarkston v. Bridge
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
This is a proceeding under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA), ORS ch 110, in which plaintiff, a Washington resident, seeks support for her minor daughter from defendant, an Oregon resident. The trial court found defendant to be the father of the child and awarded plaintiff $75 per month support. The Court of Appeals reversed, 20 Or App 129, 530 P2d 884, supplemental opinion, 21 Or App 1, 533 P2d 815 (1975). We granted review to consider important questions concerning the interpretation of the UEESA.
Plaintiff, an unwed mother in Kitsap County, Washington, sought support…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Kankkonen v. HENDRICKSONOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Sardonis v. SardonisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- State v. PopielOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Bagley v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Department of Social Services v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.