Legal Opinion

Gostevskyh v. Kalugin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 14, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

This is a filiation proceeding in which defendant appeals from an adverse judgment requiring him to contribute to the support of his illegitimate child. That judgment was based on a jury verdict finding defendant to be the father of the child in question.

The proceeding was initiated by the plaintiff’s filing a petition that contained the required allegations. See, ORS 109.125(2). Defendant demurred on the ground that the petition failed to state a cause of action. The trial court overruled defendant’s demurrer, and this action is assigned as error.

The child in question was born May 31, 1969.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State ex rel. Carson v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Dannells v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Smith v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clarkston v. BridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Allied Veterans Council v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Russell v. Pacific Maritime Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State ex rel. Riley v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. McKenna v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API