Legal Opinion

Robert E. Anderson v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of Alabama, Health Maintenance Group

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 1990No. 89-7696PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

Appellee Robert Anderson sued his health insurers, appellants Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama (Blue Cross) and Health Maintenance Group of Birmingham, Inc. (HMG), for denied benefits. The trial court held appellants liable under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., for the medical expenses Anderson had incurred. Because the trial court misconstrued the applicable standard of review under Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch, 489 U.S. 101, 109 S.Ct. 948, 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989), as well as the language of the insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. James Guy, Counterclaim v. Southeastern Iron Workers' Welfare Fund, CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kevin L. Lee v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Gay Lesbian Bisexual Alliance v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Neurological Resources, P.C. v. Anthem InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
  4. Torre v. Federated Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. Daniels v. Anchor Hocking Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API