Arvest Bank v. SpiritBank, N.A.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ADAMS, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 After the trial court entered an order granting Arvest Bank (Arvest) and Spirit-Bank, N.A. (Spirit) only part of the relief each had requested, Arvest filed an appeal and Spirit filed a counter appeal. Each argued that the other was not entitled to relief because the trial court had erred in its determination as to the priority of and existence of security interests in proceeds from automobiles when applying the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) adopted in Oklahoma. We agree that the trial court erred in failing to apply the law for the priority…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Al's Auto Sales v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Bradley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Baptist Building Corp. v. BarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Medico Leasing Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farm Credit Services of America, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- HERRING v. GRAHAMCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Payne v. FawkesDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2014