Legal Opinion

Styles v. Ceranski

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 30, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 93-0450PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Presiding Judge.

Walter A Ceranski, M.D., Cathy Ceranski, and Walter A Ceranski, M.D., Ltd. appeal from a judgment entered on a jury’s verdict holding Dr. Ceranski solely at fault for an unnecessary pancreatectomy performed by Dr. Attila S. Szokol on Appellee Maria B. Styles. Because there is no evidentiary support for a verdict that Dr. Ceranski was at fault but Dr. Szokol was not, we reverse the judgment. Because the liability and damages issues were intertwined, and were both impacted by the trial court’s error in allowing three of Styles’ damages witnesses to become standard…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Saide v. StantonArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Spain v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Curlee v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Anderson v. MunizCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hutcherson v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. ChartOne, Inc. v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Golonka v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API