Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Mittal

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 7, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00621Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JASON MEYER, an individual, and No. 3:21-cv-00621 ARGIL DX LLC f/k/a ZAP TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC, a OPINION & ORDER Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. ANKUR MITTAL, an individual; ARGILDX CONSULTING PVT. LTD. f/k/a ACCUNITY SOFTWARE PVT. LTD., an Indian private company; and ADX CONSULTING INC., a Texas corporation, Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiffs Jason Meyer and Argil DX LLC (formerly known as Zap Technology Solutions LLC) bring seven claims for relief against Defendants Ankur Mittal, Argildx…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social WorkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API