Support Obligation of Day v. State
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
The plaintiff, Stuart Anthony Day (Day), brought a petition in the District Court seeking review of a decision of the Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) that his child support obligation was past due and permitting CSED to begin income withholding to satisfy the arrearage. The District Court for the Seventeenth Judicial District, Phillips County, reversed the agency decision holding that CSED’s action on child support arrearage was barred under the statute of limitations of the Fort Peck Tribal Code. CSED’s motion for reconsideration of that order was denied. CSED appeals. We reverse…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- Roche v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Haines Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mary Jane WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas David MARCHINGTON; Inland Empire Shows, Inc., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Porter v. GalarneauMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Marriage of SkillenMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Satellite Cable Services, Inc. v. Northern Electric Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Marriage of ComerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.