Legal Opinion

Mary Jane WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas David MARCHINGTON; Inland Empire Shows, Inc., Defendants-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1997No. 96-35145PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the question of whether, and under what circumstances, a tribal court tort judgment is entitled to recognition in the United States Courts. We conclude that the principles of comity, not fell faith and credit, govern whether a district court should recognize and enforce a tribal court judgment. In this instance, because the tribal court lacked jurisdiction, its judgment is not entitled to recognition in the United States courts.

I

The traffic accident which precipitated this action involved Mary Jane Wilson, who is an enrolled member of the Blackfeet…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Asvesta v. PetroutsasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. James R. Smith v. Salish Kootenai College Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. The Society of Lloyd's v. James Frederick AshendenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Attorney's Process & Investigation Services, Inc. v. Sac & Fox TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API