Mary Jane WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas David MARCHINGTON; Inland Empire Shows, Inc., Defendants-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether, and under what circumstances, a tribal court tort judgment is entitled to recognition in the United States Courts. We conclude that the principles of comity, not fell faith and credit, govern whether a district court should recognize and enforce a tribal court judgment. In this instance, because the tribal court lacked jurisdiction, its judgment is not entitled to recognition in the United States courts.
I
The traffic accident which precipitated this action involved Mary Jane Wilson, who is an enrolled member of the Blackfeet…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Asvesta v. PetroutsasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- James R. Smith v. Salish Kootenai College Court of Appeals of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- The Society of Lloyd's v. James Frederick AshendenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Attorney's Process & Investigation Services, Inc. v. Sac & Fox TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.