Orgall v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Fillmore county. Tried below before Hastings, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
This is a petition in error and presents for review a judgment of the district court for Fillmore county. The action below was to recover damages on account of the killing of the plaintiff's intestate, Maria Tatro, by an engine operated by the defendant company on the 26th day of June, 1891. At the trial below, before Hastings, J., and a jury, there was a verdict for the defendant at the conclusion of the plaintiff's evidence by direction of the court, and which ruling is the basis of this proceeding.
The facts which the plaintiff’s evidence tends to establish are as follows: On the day of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Charlebois v. Gogebic & Montreal River RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Anderson v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Topping v. Town of St. LawrenceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Coops v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- City of Friend v. BurleighNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Killion v. DinklageNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.