Legal Opinion

Charlebois v. Gogebic & Montreal River Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1892PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Gogebic. (Williams, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff as administrator, to recover damages for the death of his son, a child eight years of age. On the trial of the case the court below directed a verdict in favor of the defendant company.

It appeared upon the trial that the plaintiff and his family, consisting of his wife and two children, lived in .a house situate upon land owned by the Anvil Iron Mining Company, for which company he was working. In April, 1887, the Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Yfestern Railway Company built a spur track from Bessemer to the Anvil mine. This road passed by plaintiff’s house,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Moran v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Ritz v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API