Quigley v. Stanton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
This is an action of ejectment. Judgment was for the plaintiff for possession of the premises and damages, and the defendant has appealed. The defendant does, not claim that the court erred in finding that the plaintiff has the right of possession of the land. The sole claims are that this action does not lie because no demand was made for possession by the plaintiff before it was brought and that the court erred in its award of damages.
The trial court concluded that before the action was brought there had been a written demand for possession made by a certain letter in evidence, and also an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Starr v. PeaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Norwich & New York Transportation Co. v. Western Massachusetts InsuranceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1868
- Haskell v. Eagle Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deforest Industries, Inc. v. GaetanoConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
- Abate v. OlssonConnecticut Superior Court · 1947
- Deforest Industries, Inc. v. GaetanoConnecticut Superior Court · 1983