Legal Opinion

Abate v. Olsson

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 9, 1947No. File 69044Published

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The plaintiff has sued in ejectment to obtain possession of a certain parcel of land with the buildings thereon, known as 59 Helen Street in the town of Hamden. In addition, he seeks damages and certain equitable relief. "... the com' plaint . . . contains allegations sufficient to that comprehensive form of action \ . . called . . . ejectment or disseisin’, which ‘lies for possessory rights’ in which ‘damages 'may be recovered’, and prayer for ‘equitable relief . . . may be joined with a demand for damages and possession’.” Mirando v. Mirando, 104 Conn. 318, 321.

The plaintiff purchased the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  2. Hurlburt v. BussemeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Mirando v. MirandoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Quigley v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API