Legal Opinion

Lundblade v. Phoenix

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1963No. Civ. 20728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default judgment in a quiet title action.

Question on Appeal

Was there substantial evidence to support the trial court’s order ?

The Record

On March 7, 1957, the plaintiff filed an action to quiet title to real property against two named defendants, George E. Phoenix and Natural Resources, Inc., a corporation. Pursuant to an affidavit, an order was made on May 24, 1957, that service be made on said defendants by publication. Thereafter, on February 24, 1958, a decree quieting title against both defendants was made and entered. On February 8, 1962,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. DeWITT v. GlazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Thayer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Loscalzo v. Federal Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Walter v. National Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API