Loscalzo v. Federal Mutual Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.
The petition of Salvadore Loscalzo and Bertha Loscalzo, filed in the court below, alleges in substance as follows: That petitioners entered into a contract of insurance with respondent Fedaral Mutual Insurance Co. which provided for uninsured motorists ’ coverage; that said contract contained a provision to settle by arbitration any controversy relating to liability or damages arising under the uninsured motorists’ coverage; that a controversy had arisen, but respondent maintained that there was no arbitrable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- O'MALLEY v. Petroleum Maintenance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Sawday v. Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Zak v. State Farm Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- A. D. Hoppe Co. v. Fred Katz Constr. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.