Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzalez

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1988No. B025877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GATES, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered following a nonjury trial that determined he had used a firearm during the commission of a robbery in which great bodily injury had been inflicted. He contends: “The trial court erred by (a) failing to elect between a determinate non-life sentence and a life sentence as a habitual offender after declaring that appellant should serve only 11 years; and (b) using the same facts to impose both an aggravated term and enhanced terms for prior convictions and habitual offender status.”

Appellant’s contentions arise in the following manner.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. AstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. MooringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. TuggleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. In Re DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. VictorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Brodheim v. RowlandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API