Legal Opinion

Brodheim v. Rowland

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 6, 1991No. C90-2892 TEHPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

THELTON E. HENDERSON, Chief Judge.

This matter came before the Court on petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS the petition with respect to his Equal Protection claims.

I. BACKGROUND

California allows inmates to reduce their sentences by earning credits for good behavior and work as prescribed by the California Penal Code. For inmates who com mitted crimes before 1983, California Penal Code § 2931 (hereinafter “§ 2931”) reduces sentences by one day for every two days served with good behavior and participation in prison…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re OluwaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. William K. Bunyan v. Luis M. Camacho, Don C. Warner, Bertha L. Duenas, Frank C. Cruz and Jesus B. PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. People v. TuggleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Benio Kalka v. Dan VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Michael Josef Brodheim v. James K. Rowland, Director, California Department of Corrections Ron KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. HodgekinsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  5. Sylvia Martinez v. Susan Poole, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API