Legal Opinion

Helvetia Milk Condensing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 7, 1932No. F-203PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

A new trial was allowed in this case on motion of the plaintiff. The position of the plaintiff is that under the arrangements and the agreement with the defendant it was not liable for any refund to the government for shipments of milk made to the military establishments unless it had made more than an average profit of 42 cents per case, calculated on the total shipments over, the entire period of fourteen months covered by the agreement; that the audit made by the Federal Trade Commission showed that for the period of the fourteen months covered¡by the agreement the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Standard Dredging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. James Stewart & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Mohawk Condensed Milk Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. Briggs & Turivas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  2. Helvetia Milk Condensing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. American Potash Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  5. Goltra v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API