Legal Opinion
Abu-Adas v. Employment Department, Food Employers, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1997No. EAB 95-AB-1473; CA A90650 (Control); EAB 95-AB-1834; CA A90651; EAB 95-AB-1952; CA A90652; SC S43780PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
In these three unemployment compensation cases, consolidated for the purposes of administrative and judicial review, the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denied petitioners’ claims for unemployment compensation benefits.1 The EAB ruled that, because petitioners were absent from work due to a “labor dispute,” they were disqualified from receiving benefits under ORS 657.200(1), set out in the margin and post at 484.2 The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Abu-Adas v. Employment Division, 143 Or App 629, 924 P2d 877 (1996). We allowed review to determine whether ORS 657.200(1) applies in a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In the Matter of Marriage of Perlenfein and PerlenfeinOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by21 opinions
- George v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Tye v. McFetridgeOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Don Whitaker Logging, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- U.S. Bancorp v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Jones v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.