Legal Opinion

Venetucci v. Metro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1998No. WCB 96-04416; CA A97153PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) dismissal of her request for hearing. The issue is whether the ALJ erred by dismissing claimant’s claim because she failed to seek reconsideration of a notice of closure. Because we conclude that claimant was not required to seek reconsideration of the notice of closure, we reverse.

Claimant suffered a compensable heel injury while working for Metropolitan Service District (Metro). Metro’s insurer, SAIF, originally calculated claimant’s average weekly wage at $515 and compensated…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API