Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Crumpley

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 22, 1998No. NMCM 98 00358PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEFTON, Senior Judge:

We have examined the record of trial, the error assigned by appellant,1 and the Government’s response. After careful consideration, we conclude the findings and sentence to be correct in law and fact and find no error materially prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights was committed. Arts. 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c) (1994)[hereinafter UCMJ].

Appellant was tried on 15 August 1997, by a court-martial composed of a military judge alone, and convicted in accordance with her pleas of unauthorized absences in violation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. DiazUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. SmithNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  2. United States v. HacklerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  3. United States v. SuksdorfU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  4. United States v. HenegarNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  5. United States v. StevensNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API