United States v. Smith
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOMBROSKI, Chief Judge:
We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error,1 and the Government’s response thereto, and we have concluded that the first assignment of error has merit. However, we do not agree with appellant’s requested relief — that we approve a bad-conduct discharge in lieu of the adjudged dishonorable discharge. For the reasons stated below, we will return the record for the convening authority to withdraw his original action and substitute a corrected action. Rule for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.] 1107(g), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (1995 ed.).
Background
P…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. MontesinosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. DiazUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. CruzU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. NelsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. CrumpleyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. KleinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. GarzaArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. RobbinsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004