Legal Opinion

Jarupan v. Hanna

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2007No. 06AP-1069PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Klatt, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Sumonta Jarupan, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendant-appellee, Roy Hanna. For the following reasons, we reverse in part and remand.

{¶ 2} On May 17, 2005, Jarupan filed a complaint asserting claims for breach of contract and conversion against Hanna. In the complaint, Jarupan alleged that she had hired Hanna, who does business as AAA Roofing & Home Improvement, to do repair and renovation work at her home and at a rental property that she owns. According to Jarupan, Hanna failed to perform all of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Doner v. SnappOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Groob v. KeyBankOhio Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Savedoff v. Access Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Lucarell v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. McAfee, Inc. v. Agilysys, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  4. Claris, Ltd. v. Hotel Dev. Servs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Reeves v. HealyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API