State of Cal. v. Continental Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
This case considers complex questions of insurance policy coverage interpretation in connection with a federal court-ordered cleanup of the state’s Stringfellow Acid Pits waste site. We initially address the “ ‘continuous injury’ trigger of coverage,” as that principle was explained in Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1995) 10 Cal.4th 645, 655 [42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 913 P.2d 878] (Montrose) and the “all sums” rule adopted in Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co. (1997) 17 Cal.4th 38, 55-57 [70 Cal.Rptr.2d 118, 948 P.2d 909] (Aerojet), and conclude that the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- The Matter of Viking Pump Inc. and Warren Pumps LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Fluor Corporation v. Super. Ct.California Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Cont'l Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.