Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Donohue v. Peterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

In his complaint plaintiff alleges:

‘ ‘ 1. That the plaintiff now is and at all times herein expressed was a doctor of dental surgery duly authorized and licensed to practice dental surgery within the State of Oregon under the laws of the State of Oregon; and that he is now engaged in the practice of dental surgery within the City of Eugene, Lane County, Oregon.

2. That the defendant now is and at all times herein expressed was a doctor of dental surgery duly authorized and licensed to practice dental surgery within the State of Oregon under the laws of the State of Oregon. ’ ’

The execution of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeck v. JakelOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Proctor v. HanselSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Kinloch Long Distance Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Thompson Optical Institute v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co. v. CraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  2. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  3. McGarry v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hemstreet v. WarlickOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Newport Terminals, Inc. v. Sunset Terminals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API