Durrah v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Morgan, J. —
The question is whether a plaintiff claiming title by adverse possession has the right to a jury trial under article I, section 21 of the Washington Constitution. The answer is no if, as is true here, the plaintiff presently possesses the disputed land.
*636Richard and Jolan Durrah sued Wright,1 the titleholder of record, to quiet title to land on which the Durrahs were then maintaining a pipeline. The Durrahs alleged that they had been “in actual, open, adverse, notorious, and uninterrupted possession for more than ten (10) years[,]” and that they had acquired title by adverse…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Green v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Durrah v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Wynn v. EarinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Wynn v. EarinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.