Legal Opinion
Durrah v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 14, 2003No. 28410-3-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 P.3d 184 (2003)
115 Wash.App. 634
Richard and Jolan DURRAH, Appellants,
v.
Otis E. and Flora WRIGHT, Respondents.
No. 28410-3-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
February 14, 2003.
Stephen L. Wozny, Longview, for Respondent.
John Herbert Bigelow, William John Faubion, Cathlamet, for Appellants.
MORGAN, J.
The question is whether a plaintiff claiming title by adverse possession has the right to a jury trial under article I, § 21 of the Washington Constitution. The answer is no if, as is true here, the plaintiff presently possesses the disputed land.
Richard and Jolan Durrah sued Wright,[1]…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Green v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Green v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Wynn v. EarinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Wynn v. EarinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.