Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D. A. D.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1997No. A96A2268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

A juvenile court found that D. A. D. committed the delinquent act of disorderly conduct. The court placed D. A. D. on probation and ordered him to adhere to a 6:00 p.m. curfew, write a letter of apology, and pay a $50 supervisory fee. D. A. D. appeals, and we affirm.

1. In his second through sixth enumerations of error, D. A. D. challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.(a) Although D. A. D.’s fourth enumeration of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and asserts that the offense charged was so vague and indefinite as to violate due process and equal protection, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Query v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. In the Interest of J. D. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re JULIO LArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Louise C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. In Re Julio L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. In Re JULIO LArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Julio L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API