Legal Opinion
Feeney v. Willard
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a longshoreman whose claim for compensation under the provisions of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S. C.A. § 901 et seq., was rejected by the defendant Deputy Commissioner as not timely filed. Judicial review of the administrative proceedings is invoked by a complaint that seeks a mandatory injunction setting aside the order of rejection and directing defendant to award compensation to the plaintiff. 33 U.S. C.A. § 921(b). The issues are presented for decision by cross-motions for summary judgment.
The basic facts are not in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Voris v. EikelSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Gooding v. WillardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Claim of Kaplan v. Kaplan Knitting Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gragg v. WM Harris & SonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Priedigkeit v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Holt v. Raleigh City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1958
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. CalbeckDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.