Legal Opinion

Reuben G. Lenske v. Magner Dale Knutsen and Judith Knutsen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1969No. 22207PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

This proceeding started out as a suit brought by the United States to foreclose a mortgage held by Farmers’ Home Administration, an agency of the United States. The mortgagor-defendant was appellee Magner Knutsen, and appellant Lenske was joined as one claiming interest in the property. The rights and interests of the United States are not involved here. The dispute before us resulted from a cross-claim filed by Knut-sen against Lenske asserting a right to be adjudicated owner of the property subject to the Government mortgage and charging Lenske with fraud in depriving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarke E. Davenport v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association and Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Martin v. CambasOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Coates v. SlusherOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Fogarty v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Manuel Glenn Abascal, United States of America v. Paul Gordon FrakesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Bobby Kent WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Interpetrol Bermuda Ltd. v. Kaiser Aluminum International Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API