Tina Griffith v. General Motors Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge:
There are three appeals before us in this case. In the first, Tina Griffith appeals the judgment against her in her action against General Motors for damages for injuries she sustained as the result of an alleged automotive design defect. In a related but separately filed case, she appeals the denial of her post-trial motions for relief from judgment and for contempt and sanctions against General Motors. Finally, General Motors appeals the denial of its pre-trial motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Griffith’s seatbelt claim is preempted by federal law.
I
On the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Frederick A. Hurley and Christine A. Hurley v. Motor Coach Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Lewis v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor. Nancy Knupfer, Trustee v. John Lindblade, in Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor, John Lindblade v. Nancy Knupfer, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Florentino Prieto v. Manuel MalgorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- O'Hara Ex Rel. H.O. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.