Legal Opinion

O'Hara Ex Rel. H.O. v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 20, 2007No. 06-10498PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:

Chad and Michelle O’Hara (“the O’Har-as”) bring suit against General Motors Corporation (“GM”) for injuries sustained by their daughter, H.O., when she was partially ejected from a 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe during a rollover accident. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of GM on the ground that the suit is preempted by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (“FMVSS”) 205. 49 C.F.R. § 571.205. The O’Haras appeal. For the reasons stated below, we reverse in part, affirm in part and remand to the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

H.O., a minor,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re DEEPWATER HORIZONCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. David Atkins v. Ken Salazar, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Collins v. Navistar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority v. Action RefundCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API