Legal Opinion

Brophy v. Suffolk County Apportionment Commissioners

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 26, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

The third report of the apportionment commissioners elected in accordance with St. 1913, c. 835, § 390, attempting to divide Suffolk County into representative districts, and to apportion among them the representatives assigned to that county, is attacked by these proceedings * as contrary to art. 21 of the Amendments to the Constitution.

The general principles by which such an apportionment must be made in order to conform to that amendment to the Constitution have been stated at length in the two recent decisions in which it has been necessary to declare void the two earlier reports of these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Sherrill v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Attorney General v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Brooks v. State ex rel. SingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Matter of BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Attorney General v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Opinion of Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Cohen v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Town of Brookline v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API