Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 31, 1968PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

Ten qualified voters bring two petitions, one for a writ of certiorari against the Attorney General, and one for a writ of mandamus against the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Most allegations are common to the petitions, which attack as unconstitutional an initiative petition, purporting to be signed by ten qualified voters, filed with the Secretary on September 6, 1967. This sought the enactment, under art. 48 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth, of an initiative amendment for the purpose of reducing the size of the House from 240 to 160 members and for a decennial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Horton v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Attorney General v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Fanciullo v. B. G. & S. Theatre Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Town of Mount Washington v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'n v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Coalition for Political Honesty v. State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Slama v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Mazzone v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. PenroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API