Legal Opinion
Moore v. Election Commissioners
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 23, 1941PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus brought in the Superior Court. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 213, § 1A (see St. 1941, c. 180); c. 249, § 5. The petitioner is a resident and legal voter of the city of Cambridge. The respondents are the duly appointed and qualified board of election commissioners of said city. See St. 1921, c. 239, as finally amended with respect to § 3 thereof by St. 1939, c. 432; Kidder v. Mayor of Cambridge, 304 Mass. 491. The petitioner seeks an order that the respondents conduct the municipal election in Cambridge in 1941 in accordance with the provisions of G. L. (Ter.…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.