Legal Opinion
State v. Van Eck
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 30, 2002No. AC 20595PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Herman Van Eck, appearing pro se, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of failure to register a commercial motor vehicle garaged or operated in Connecticut in violation of General Statutes § 14-*48412a.1 On appeal, the defendant’s claims can be stated in the following manner: (1) the court improperly allowed the state to proceed pursuant to a charge that was different from that stated in the summons; (2) the state is preempted from requiring registration pursuant to § 14-12aby 49 U.S.C. § 14501 (Sup. 11995); (3) the court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Hoskins v. Titan Value Equities Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Collins v. Anthem Health Plans, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. Wilson F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Rowe v. GouletConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. CaracogliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.