Longwell Lumber & Building Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
The parties seek a construction of a standard workmen’s compensation and employers’ liability policy issued by the defendant, hereinafter called insurer, to the plaintiff, hereinafter called insured. The complaint does not include a complete copy of the policy but alleges the issuance of the policy, “ the original of which will be produced upon the trial of this action * * The plaintiff in his brief says: “ But * * * it is the intention of the plaintiff, concurred in, we believe, by the defendant, that the sole question to be considered under the pleadings is whether or not a casualty company…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bloom-Rosenblum-Kline Co. v. Union Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- Claim of Cheesman v. CheesmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butter Nut Baking Company v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. Audlane Realty Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Howard v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947