Legal Opinion

Longwell Lumber & Building Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

The parties seek a construction of a standard workmen’s compensation and employers’ liability policy issued by the defendant, hereinafter called insurer, to the plaintiff, hereinafter called insured. The complaint does not include a complete copy of the policy but alleges the issuance of the policy, “ the original of which will be produced upon the trial of this action * * The plaintiff in his brief says: “ But * * * it is the intention of the plaintiff, concurred in, we believe, by the defendant, that the sole question to be considered under the pleadings is whether or not a casualty company…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brassil v. . Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Bloom-Rosenblum-Kline Co. v. Union Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Claim of Cheesman v. CheesmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. HellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butter Nut Baking Company v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Great American Indemnity Co. v. Audlane Realty Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  3. Howard v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API