Howard v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
This is a defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, made at the close of the case, and as to which decision was reserved. On December 19, 1946, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $4,281.17, under instructions that the only question submitted to them was the amount of damage deemed to have been established, on the assumption that as a matter of law the plaintiff should prevail, but that as to such assumption the responsibility lay with the court.
The action was for breach of contract,, namely, the failure of the defendant to defend in the name of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MoritzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Lunt v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Washington Brick & Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Cornell v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. ShaferDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. C. Y. Thomason Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1950