Legal Opinion
Bloom-Rosenblum-Kline Co. v. Union Indemnity Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 1929No. 21537PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
It is to be observed that by the policy of insurance issued to the plaintiff company the indemnity company agreed to insure plaintiff against loss from liability imposed by law upon tbe assured for damages on account of bodily injuries accidentally suffered, or alleged to have been accidentally suffered, by any person or persons, caused by the automobile vehicle described in statement No. 5 of the declarations, and that it further agreed that said policy should cover the operation of all automobiles and trailers of the type stated in the policy, hired by the assured during the term thereof…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Mayor, Lane & Co. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- South Knoxville Brick Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Greer-Robbins Co. v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Coast Lumber Co. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Danek v. HommerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Missionaries of the Co. of Mary, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.