Legal Opinion
Claim of Cheesman v. Cheesman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1923PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
The claimant, nineteen years old, was injured on November 15, 1918. A claim for compensation was mailed to the commission within a year but was not received. TMs was not such a filing as is required by section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67). (Sweeney v. State, 225 N. Y. 271.) Nor was the claim actually filed until February 4,1921. A hearing was thereafter had before the commission. To it the ACtna Life Insurance Company, as the carrier, was made a party. It objected to any award because of tMs delay. The employer was the claimant’s father and not unnaturally failed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sweeney v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- McMullen v. . RaffertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Dawes v. ShedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
- Claim of O'Esau v. E. W. Bliss Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Matter of Skoczlois v. . VinocourNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Sukup v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Chapman v. HoageSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- American Trading Co. v. FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Claim of Jaabeck v. Theodore A. Crane's Sons Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Matter of Decker v. Pouvailsmith Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.